How Many Animals Died From Animal Testing
What have humans gained from animal testing? Are we getting closer to finding a cure for HIV, cancer, and other diseases through animal experiments? These eleven animal testing statistics will help you sympathise how animal experiments (don't) piece of work and what we're (not) getting out of them.
1. Each yr, more than 110 one thousand thousand animals—including mice, frogs, dogs, rabbits, monkeys, fish, and birds—are killed in U.Due south. laboratories.
Experimenters forcefulness animals to inhale toxic fumes, immobilize them in restraint devices, drill holes into their skulls, mutilate their brains, and burn their skin and eyes—and if the animals don't die in the procedure, they're killed afterward. Whether it's for biology lessons, medical training, marvel-driven experiments, or chemic, drug, nutrient, or cosmetics testing, these animals are confined to barren cages, socially isolated, and psychologically traumatized.
2. Ninety-v percent of all drugs that are shown to be safe and effective in brute tests neglect in human being trials.
This stat comes directly from the National Institutes of Health (NIH)—the government bureau that funnels billions of our taxpayer dollars into these reckless experiments. NIH has noted that the drugs fail in humans because they either don't work or are dangerous. Because beast trials are and then unreliable, they make human ones more risky.
iii. Ninety-nine per centum of the animals used in laboratories aren't covered by federal animal protection laws.
It's as if the regime were maxim, "I'1000 sorry, merely you're simply not animal enough" to the tens of millions of rats, mice, birds, fish, reptiles, and amphibians who plant 99% of the animals used in laboratories yet are excluded by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) and therefore denied even the near basic consideration. However, even animals who are supposedly "protected" nether the AWA are notwithstanding allowed to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, restrained, made addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged. No exam—no matter how painful or trivial—is illegal. And pain relief isn't required.
© Doctors Against Animal Experiments
4. Between 2015 and 2019, more 300,000 animals covered under the AWA were subjected to painful experiments without hurting relief.
Rabbits oasis't received any pain relief in the Draize centre and skin irritation and corrosion tests since they started in the 1940s. In these tests, a substance is dripped into rabbits' eyes or smeared onto their shaved skin, leaving them to suffer from inflammation, ulcers, bleeding, irritated and cloudy eyes, blindness, redness, swelling, discharge, and hemorrhaging.
5. A 2009 survey plant that mice and rats used in invasive, painful surgeries were merely provided with mail service-operative pain relief about twenty% of the time.
The survey found that mice and rats who were subjected to skull surgeries, burn down experiments, spinal surgeries, and other horrors rarely received post-procedural hurting relief. Imagine someone drilling open your skull to expose your encephalon but not giving yous so much every bit an Advil.
6. More than than 93% of experimental cancer drugs failed in the starting time phase of human clinical trials afterward testing "successfully" on animals.
The survey was based on nigh four,500 cancer drugs developed betwixt 2003 and 2011. Artificially inducing a status in a good for you private of a dissimilar species who is confined and isolated in stressful, unnatural conditions and so applying the results to naturally occurring diseases in humans is not only unethical just also ridiculous. Even animal experimenters admit that the farthermost distress that these animals endure jeopardizes the results.
Nosotros've been handicapped by the fact that we take been studying diseases in animals that don't really exist in animals. Mice … don't get schizophrenia. They don't go Alzheimer'south disease.
—Dr. Christer Nordstedt, Eli Lilly's vice president of neuroscience research
vii. The chemicals that cause cancer in rats simply cause information technology in mice 46% of the fourth dimension.
If extrapolating from rats to mice is so unreliable, imagine the inefficiency of applying results from mice, rats, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys to humans. Richard Klausner, quondam head of the National Cancer Institute, said, "The history of cancer inquiry has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse. Nosotros take cured mice of cancer for decades and information technology simply didn't work in humans."
8. One hundred HIV vaccines accept been successful in animal experiments—100% of them failed to protect humans sufficiently.
In one example, an HIV vaccine that was shown to exist effective in monkeys failed in man clinical trials because it didn't prevent people from developing AIDS, and some believe that it made them more susceptible to it. According to a report inThe Independent, one conclusion was that "testing HIV vaccines on monkeys before they are used on humans, does not in fact work."
nine. Every twelvemonth in the U.South., NIH blows virtually 47% of research funding on animal experimentation.
Approximately 47% of NIH-funded research involves animals, and in 2020, the agency budgeted nearly $42 billion for research and evolution—that's $19.vi billion spent on animal experiments. Merely for what? Do yous know of any cures for multiple sclerosis, West Nile virus, or muscular dystrophy? Well, there aren't any. A 2014 review newspaper co-authored by a Yale School of Medicine professor in The BMJ documented the overwhelming failure of experiments on animals to improve human wellness, concluding that "the public'due south continuing endorsement and funding of preclinical fauna research seems misplaced."
10. Currently, 52% of U.South. adults oppose the use of animals in scientific research.
A Pew Research Center poll found that the majority of American adults oppose the use of animals in scientific research, and other surveys suggest that the misguided folks who do support it only feel that way because they wrongly believe that it's necessary. In an article published in The Journal of the American Medical Clan, researchers found that medical treatments developed for animals rarely translated to humans and warned that "patients and physicians should remain cautious well-nigh extrapolating the finding of prominent animal research to the care of homo disease … poor replication of fifty-fifty high-quality animal studies should be expected."
xi. Since 2017, PETA U.S. has had nearly 150 victories for animals used in experiments.
Our victories include helping engineers develop a new ventilator for COVID-19 patients without creature testing, working with the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration to eliminate animate being tests for health marketing claims for foods, persuading Suave to become cruelty-free, and getting pharma behemothic Bristol Myers Squibb and others to ban near-drowning tests. PETA entities' piece of work to end animal experiments—backed by the support of more than 9 million members and supporters worldwide—is saving endless animals.
*****
In NIH's almost recent v-year plan, the bureau stated that "animal models often neglect to provide good means to mimic affliction or predict how drugs volition work in humans, resulting in much wasted time and money while patients wait for therapies." Animal experiments are not a proficient indicator of drug responses in humans or whatever species other than the one existence exploited. Penicillin is the courage of man antibiotics, all the same it kills guinea pigs! Aspirin kills cats and causes birth defects in rats, mice, guinea pigs, dogs, and monkeys, and morphine, a depressant in humans, stimulates goats, cats, and horses.
All these animal testing statistics can exist boiled down to just one: Fauna experiments are speciesist—making them unacceptable 100% of the time. They don't work, and even if they did, they'd still be unacceptable. Torturing sensitive beings isn't OK, even if someone'southward pretending it's for science or medicine—it'due south equally simple as that.
Source: https://www.peta.org/features/animal-experimentation-statistics/
Posted by: johnsonyoustion.blogspot.com
0 Response to "How Many Animals Died From Animal Testing"
Post a Comment